FULL REPORT [US$ 42 750 (forty two thousand seven hundred fifty US Dollars)]

INTRODUCTION [US$ 0]

• Table 2-1 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS STUDY

GTL PRIMER [US$ 2 138]

• Figure 3-1 STEAM METHANE REFORMING
• Figure 3-2 SYNGAS GENERATION SCHEME
• Table 3-1 THEORETICAL SHULZ-FLORY-ANDERSON F T PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION FOR a = 0.92
• Table 3-2 PREFERRED REACTOR DESIGN TYPES FOR MAJOR F-T TECHNOLOGY OWNERS
• Figure 3-3 TYPICAL PROCESSING SCHEME FOR GROUP I BASESTOCKS
• Figure 3-4 TYPICAL PROCESSING SCHEME FOR GROUP II BASESTOCKS
• Figure 3-5 GTL BLOCK FLOW DIAGRAM FOR SHELL’S SMDS PROCESS

BASESTOCK PRODUCTS [US$ 6 413]

BASESTOCK MANUFACTURING ECONOMICS [US$ 6 413]

• Figure 5-1 BASESTOCK REFINING CAPACITIES BY REGION
• Table 5-1 REFINING CAPACITIES OF NORTH AMERICAN PARAFFINIC BASESTOCK PLANTS BY API GROUP, 2001
• Figure 5-2 GROUP I MANUFACTURING – SOLVENT EXTRACTION
• Figure 5-3 GROUP II MANUFACTURING – HYDROCRACKING
• Figure 5-4 GROUP III MANUFACTURING – SLACK WAX
• Figure 5-5 GROUP III MANUFACTUIRNG – FUELS HYDROCRACKER BOTTOMS
• Figure 5-6 GROUP IV (PAO) MANUFACTURING SCHEME
• Table 5-2 REPRESENTATIVE SCENARIOS FOR GTL-DERIVED BASESTOCKS
• Figure 5-8 GTL-DERIVED BASESTOCKS – SMALL FUELS PLANT
• Figure 5-9 GTL-DERIVED BASESTOCKS – SMALL SPECIALTIES PLANT
• Table 5-3 BASESTOCK MANUFACTURING COST STRUCTURE, GROUP I
• Table 5-4 BASESTOCK MANUFACTURING COST STRUCTURE, GROUP II
• Table 5-5 BASESTOCK MANUFACTURING COST STRUCTURE, GROUP III
• Table 5-6 BASESTOCK MANUFACTURING COST STRUCTURE, GROUP IV
• Table 5-7 BASESTOCK MANUFACTURING COST STRUCTURE, GTL SPECIALTIES
• Table 5-8 BASESTOCK MANUFACTURING COST STRUCTURE, GTL SMALL FUELS
• Table 5-9 BASESTOCK MANUFACTURING COST STRUCTURE, GTL FUELS MEGA-PLANT
• Table 5–10 SUMMARY OF BASESTOCK MANUFACTURING COSTS, 2002
• Table 5-11 SUMMARY OF GTL-DERIVED BASESTOCK MANUFACTURING COSTS, 2002
• Figure 5-10 MANUFACTURING COST ESTIMATES, 2002
• Table 5-12 MANUFACTURING COSTS SUMMARY – CONVERSION AND NET HYDROCARBON COSTS
• Figure 5-11 TOTAL PRODUCTION COSTS, 2002 – NET HYDROCARBON COSTS

GLOBAL BASESTOCK SUPPLY ANALYSIS AND FORECAST [US$ 6 413]

• Figure 6-1 ESTIMATED GLOBAL BASESTOCK SUPPLY BY API GRADE, 2000
• Table 6-1 ESTIMATED GLOBAL BASESTOCK CAPACITY AND SUPPLY, 2000
• Table 6-2 ESTIMATED CAPACITY OF LEADING BASESTOCK SUPPLIERS IN NORTH AMERICA, 2000
• Table 6-3 ESTIMATED CAPACITY OF LEADING BASESTOCK SUPPLIERS IN WESTERN EUROPE, 2000
• Table 6-4 ESTIMATED CAPACITY OF LEADING BASESTOCK SUPPLIERS IN JAPAN, 2000
• Table 6-5 ESTIMATED CAPACITY OF LEADING BASESTOCK SUPPLIERS IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION, 2000
• Table 6-6 GLOBAL GROUP III INSTALLED AND FORECAST SUPPLY BY REFINER, 2000 TO 2015: MOST LIKELY CASE
• Table 6-7 CURRENT AND FUTURE ESTIMATED CAPACITY OF GTL SUPPLIERS
• Table 6-8 PLANNED PARAFFINIC GROUP III AND GTL PROJECTS BASED ON LIKELIHOOD, 2000 TO 2015 KBD
• Table 6-9 GLOBAL BASESTOCK SUPPLY FORECAST, BASE CASE
• Table 6-10 GLOBAL BASESTOCK SUPPLY FORECAST, OPTIMISTIC CASE
• Table 6-11 GLOBAL BASESTOCK SUPPLY FORECAST, PESSIMISTIC CASE

GLOBAL BASESTOCK DEMAND ANALYSIS AND FORECAST [US$ 6 413]

• Table 7-1 ESTIMATED GLOBAL BASESTOCK DEMAND FORECAST, BASE CASE
• Table 7-2 ESTIMATED GLOBAL BASESTOCK DEMAND FORECAST, OPTIMISTIC CASE
• Table 7-3 ESTIMATED GLOBAL BASESTOCK DEMAND FORECAST, PESSIMISTIC CASE

SUPPLY AND DEMAND BALANCE [US$ 6 413]

• Table 8-1 GLOBAL BASESTOCK SUPPLY/DEMAND FORECAST, BASE CASE
• Table 8-2 SUPPLY/DEMAND BALANCE FOR HIGHER-PERFORMANCE AND CONVENTIONAL BASE OILS, BASE CASE
• Table 8-3 GLOBAL BASESTOCK SUPPLY/DEMAND FORECAST, OPTIMISTIC CASE
• Table 8-4 SUPPLY/DEMAND BALANCE FOR HIGHER-PERFORMANCE AND CONVENTIONAL BASE OILS, OPTIMISTIC CASE
• Table 8-5 GLOBAL BASESTOCK SUPPLY/DEMAND FORECAST, PESSIMISTIC CASE
• Table 8-6 SUPPLY/DEMAND BALANCE FOR HIGHER-PERFORMANCE AND CONVENTIONAL BASE OILS, PESSIMISTIC CASE

GLOBAL MARKET IMPACT AND BUSINESS DYNAMICS [US$ 428]

Figure 9-1 ESTIMATED NET MOVEMENT OF BASESTOCKS, 2000
• Figure 9-2 FORECAST NET MOVEMENT OF BASESTOCKS, 2015

GTL BASESTOCK MARKET SPACE AND PRICING ANALYSIS [US$ 6 413]

• Figure 10-1 LIKELY POSITIONING OF GTL BASESTOCKS
• Figure 10-2 MANUFACTURING ESTIMATES BY API GROUP
• Table 10-1 GLOBAL BASESTOCK SUPPLY DEMAND FORECAST, BASE CASE
• Table 10-2 SUPPLY/DEMAND BALANCE FOR HIGHER-PERFORMANCE AND CONVENTIONAL BASE OILS, BASE CASE
• Table 10-3 GLOBAL BASESTOCK SUPPLY DEMAND FORECAST, OPTIMISTIC CASE
• Table 10-4 SUPPLY/DEMAND BALANCE FOR HIGHER-PERFORMANCE AND CONVENTIONAL BASE OILS, OPTIMISTIC CASE
• Table 10-5 GLOBAL BASESTOCK SUPPLY DEMAND FORECAST, PESSIMISTIC CASE
• Table 10-6 SUPPLY/DEMAND BALANCE FOR HIGHER-PERFORMANCE AND CONVENTIONAL BASE OILS, PESSIMISTIC CASE
• Table 10-7 LIKELY MARKET SPACE AND PRICE POSITIONING FOR GROUP III+ BASESTOCKS, 2015
• Table 10 8 FORECAST GROUP III+ PRICES FOR 100–150N, 6 cSt MATERIAL

BARRIERS TO ENTRY FOR GTL [US$ 6 413]

• Figure 11-1 ANTICIPATED IMPACT OF BARRIERS TO MARKET ENTRY
• Figure 11-2 FISCHER-TROPSCH PATENTS BY COMPANY, DERWENT/API SYSTEM, 1964 TO 2002
• Table 11-1 EXAMPLES OF F T PATENTS FOR LUBRICANT BASESTOCK PRODUCTION

BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS [US$ 0]

SUPPLIER PROFILES [US$ 6 413]

• Table 13-1 ESTIMATED CAPACITY OF PROFILED GTL AND PARAFFINIC BASESTOCK SUPPLIERS
• Figure 13-1 CHEVRON’S REVENUES BY OPERATION, 2000
• Figure 13-2 CHEVRON’S ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, 2000
• Figure 13-3 CONOCO’S ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
• Figure 13-4 EXXONMOBIL’S EARNINGS BY BUSINESS SEGMENT, 2000
• Figure 13-5 EXXONMOBIL’S ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, 2000
• Figure 13-6 FORTUM’S CORPORATE STRUCTURE

STEP 2 of 3

All fields in *BOLD are required.

STEP 3 of 3

*Please view our terms and conditions, and check this box to indicate your acceptance of these terms and conditions.

Thank you for your interest in subscribing to our syndicated reports. To complete this process, please click on the button below and a member of our global sales team will contact you shortly to confirm the final price and complete the transaction. Upon acceptance of your order, we will deliver the files in PDF format via email.